The power of the press. Over the past few weeks, I've seen many articles on the Running Start program in the Seattle Times and PI. I paid attention. An obviously successful program (17,000 or 10% of WA high school students participate), Running Start began in the 90s and allows juniors and seniors to take college classes.

Aptly titled, Running Start gives students an early start to college life. As the Seattle Times states, it appeals to some who want to push themselves academically, or finish college a year or two early. For others, it's a money-saver since students can take college classes while in high school, for free. For these kids, Running Start is definitely a great opportunity. Those who make the best of what this program has to offer shouldn't be denied that chance.

But apparently, Running Start can also be accessed by students who have failed high school (2nd year seniors) and need to complete certain courses for graduation. Plus, as this opinion article notes, it's "too easy to get into the program." This FAQ does state that to participate, students are "subject only to minimal eligibility and procedural requirements." Unfortunately, I couldn't find a succinct list of exactly what these requirements are, but the first 21 questions of the FAQ speak to it somewhat.

Now, don't get me wrong. There are a myriad of reasons why students participate in Running Start and I think Washington State needs more programs like this to help prepare students for college and work. But the points in Flint's opinion piece does beg the question: Has Running Start gained such popularity, in part, because our high schools are failing them?

Cleveland High student Leanna Patricio said, "My thing was, I made tons of friends in high school...but I kind of felt unfocused in class. I kind of realized I wanted a little more from high school."

So what do you think? Are more and more students motivated to get a running start or are some trying to jump ship?