Let's talk exit exams.
By allisonm on 27 Sep |
0 comments
As we all know, it's nearly impossible to have a conversation about education reform here in Washington without talking about the WASL. Common questions abound, including: Is it fair to require all students to meet standard on the WASL in order to graduate? What about those who can't pass but show up to class everyday, don't they deserve a diploma? Don't such high standards create a greater achievement gap? What about special needs students?
They're also
questions all 26 states that require these exams are
grappling
with.
In this
USA Today article, Maryland School Superintendent Nancy
Grasmick is a perfect case-in-point. She wants to tie Maryland's high school
diploma to an exit exam but worries, like many in this state, about
the students that might not pass those tests.
The article offers
two points of view in response to this valid concern. The first is to offer
students "seat-time" diplomas if they can't pass the test. Some states,
like Massachusetts, give similar diplomas or "certificates of attainment" that
basically means that students have met local graduation requirements, but not
the high state standard.
The opposing
view from Grasmick is that different diplomas aren't the answer. That rigorous
standards and accountability are needed to measure instructional effectiveness
to ensure that all schools, no matter if it's in a wealthy neighborhood, poor
neighborhood, homogenous neighborhood or diverse neighborhood, are held to the
same instructional standard. Therefore, the education system is forced
to provide (as best they can!) all students with the same quality of education.
Plus, Grasmick notes, having one high standard in her state has resulted
in students rising to the challenge.
Grasmick is also a proponent of alternative paths
to the same
standards. And for those students with special needs (i.e.
Special Ed, ELL students, etc.) she believes another measure of success is
necessary. But one that is of equal rigor to the exit exam rather than one that
is awarded simply for showing up to class.
Grasmick is spot
on.
We can't
stress it enough -- higher standards benefit ALL kids. It helps to close the
achievement gap (see results from our Nation's Report Card for
more) because it provides a framework for an equal, quality education for all
students. No matter a child's family background or challenges he/she may face,
research shows that the higher the bar is set, the more likely a student will
rise to meet it.
Continuing to hand out "seat-time" diplomas that do not
adequately arm students with the skills they'll need for life after high school
helps no one. In fact, it just hinders their chances for success after
graduation day.
|
||






