CONNECT WITH US Facebook Twitter

Resource

print mail
  • 2 (4) |
  • A (230) |
  • B (27) |
  • C (257) |
  • D (84) |
  • E (325) |
  • F (106) |
  • G (116) |
  • H (20) |
  • I (101) |
  • J (1) |
  • K (109) |
  • L (128) |
  • M (395) |
  • N (203) |
  • O (88) |
  • P (175) |
  • Q (1) |
  • R (272) |
  • S (556) |
  • T (451) |
  • U (44) |
  • V (17) |
  • W (996) |

Partnership for Learning Releases "Improving the Odds" Policy Report

In 2007, Partnership for Learning and the College & Work Ready Agenda released Improving the Odds: Preparing Washington Students for Family-Wage Jobs. In the report, we refuted the notion that a high school diploma is sufficient to ensure a family-wage job. Instead, the research made clear that, to earn a family-wage job, students must receive an education that prepares them to succeed in college and beyond.

Since the release of Improving the Odds, changing economic conditions have only increased the demand for family-wage jobs. Since 2007, the United States has faced one of the worst economic recessions since the Great Depression. This national recession has had ripple effects in Washington, and employment reports released through the spring and summer of 2011 have confirmed a slowdown in both the national and Washington state economies.

That's why Partnership for Learning has updated this important report. In Improving the Odds "2.0", we provide an analysis of the existing workforce needs and outline policies that Washington state must address if every student is to graduate prepared to succeed in our globally competitive economy. 

To read this report, click here


Tapping Charter Schools to Turn Around The Nation’s Dropout Factories

Students who attend a charter high school are 7 to 15 percentage points more likely to graduate and earn a high school diploma than are traditional public high school students.

In the policy report "Charting New Territory: Tappying Charter Schools to Turn Around The Nation's Droupout Factories", by the Center for American Progress, the role of charter schools in turning around the nation’s lowest-performing high schools. Based on conversations with charter school operators, school district staff, researchers, and education reform experts, the report examines how some pioneering cities—Los Angeles and Philadelphia in particular— are partnering with local charter operators to turn around some of their dropout factories and improve college readiness and graduation rates.

Topics: STEM and Innovation |
Type: Resource

Will Seniority-Based Layoffs Undermine School Improvement Efforts in Washington State?

A centerpiece of U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan’s school reform agenda, School Improvement Grant (SIG) funds are intended to transform or turn around chronically failing schools. Analyzing Washington State personnel files, researchers at the Center on Reinventing Public Education found that teachers at risk of layoff are concentrated in schools receiving SIG funds. Many teachers in these schools are newly hired, chosen on the basis of high ability and commitment to education of disadvantaged children.

A new analysis by the Center on Reinventing Public Education, "Will Seniority-Based Layoffs Undermine School Improvement Efforts in Washington State?" finds that policies known as “last in, first out” may disproportionately affect schools receiving SIG funding. In Washington’s SIG schools, about 23% of teachers are in their first three years of teaching. That’s nearly twice the proportion of new teachers in other schools in the same districts. This analysis concludes: “Under current policy, teachers in these schools will face a higher risk for layoffs, potentially destabilizing schools and undermining turnaround efforts.”


Schools in High Gear: Reforms That Work When They Work Together

As the urgency for improving America’s schools increases, the core ideas guiding education reform remain remarkably stable, defying the ideological or partisan claims that can often stifle political change. “Schools in High Gear, Reforms That Work When They Work Together” is a collection of essays from some of the leading minds in education, explaining why a silver bullet won’t fix America’s schools–comprehensive policy solutions are needed.

Leaders of five national organizations that serve as policy partners for the Policy Innovators in Education (PIE) Network co-authored the paper. They explain how the following core ideas crucial to education reform evolved and why they continued to be sharpened through the interplay with other goals.

 

 


Passing Muster: Evaluating Teacher Evaluation Systems

U.S. public schools are in the early stages of a revolution in how they go about evaluating teachers. In years past there was little more than intuition and anecdote to support the view that teachers vary in their quality and, as such, it has been nearly impossible to discover and act on performance differences among teachers when documented records show them all to be the same.

A new generation of teacher evaluation systems seeks to make performance measurement and feedback more rigorous and useful. These systems incorporate multiple sources of information, including such metrics as systematic classroom observations, student and parent surveys, measures of professionalism and commitment to the school community, more differentiated principal ratings, and test score gains for students in each teacher’s classrooms.

This report, "Passing Muster: Evaluating Teacher Evaluation Systems," by Brookings tackles some of the tough questions that states and districts will face as they implement a new teacher evaluation model. Including: how a state or the federal government could achieve a uniform standard for dispensing funds to school districts for the recognition of exceptional teachers without imposing a uniform evaluation system on those district?  How can individual school districts benchmark the performance of their teacher evaluation system against the performance of evaluation systems in other districts or against the previous version of their own evaluation system?  In other words, how can teacher evaluation systems be compared, one to another?


What Does Washington State Get for Its Investment in Bonuses for Board Certified Teachers?

Washington State is set to spend nearly $100 million in the next two years on pay bonuses for teachers who receive national board certification. This investment is supposed to improve the state’s teaching force and encourage the most capable teachers to work in high-poverty schools. Does it accomplish those goals?

The Center on Reinventing Public Education's most recent report, What Does Washington State Get for Its Investment in Bonuses for Board Certified Teachers?, examines the available evidence in an effort to shed light on what the NBCT bonus program set out to do—namely, to reward strong teachers across the state and encourage them to teach in high-poverty schools—and whether it is achieving the desired effects.


The State of State U.S. History Standards 2011

In the Fordham Foundtion's first review of the quality of state U.S. history standards since 2003, The State of State U.S. History Standards, reviewers evaluated state standards for U.S. history in grades K-12.

What they found is discouraging: Twenty-eight states deserve D or F grades for their academic standards in this key subject. The average grade across all states is a dismal D; the same grade Forhdam Foundation issued Washington state.